SAM2Scene: SAM Knows How to Segment 3D Instances

University of Science and Technology Beijing · *Corresponding authors

ACM Multimedia 2026 (Oral)
Comparison between tracking-based propagation and SAM2Scene multi-view proposal association
Instead of propagating a fragile single-view mask, SAM2Scene associates a proposal pool through projected geometry and cross-view support.

Build consistency from geometry,
not from propagation.

Recent zero-shot 3D instance segmentation methods lift multi-view 2D masks into point clouds, but tracking-based pipelines depend on a single initial mask and can accumulate errors across views.

We present SAM2Scene, a training-free framework that replaces sequential mask propagation with geometry-grounded multi-view proposal association. We further observe that SAM2's predicted IoU correlates with 3D mask quality. SAM2Scene turns this signal into an adaptive fidelity prior for graph construction and clustering, prioritizing reliable proposals to produce coherent 3D instances.

SAM2 already hints at
which masks to trust.

Ranking proposals by SAM2's predicted IoU retrieves substantially higher-quality 3D masks than random selection and closely tracks the oracle 2D IoU ranking.

Proposal ranking analysis comparing random choice, oracle 2D IoU, and SAM predicted IoU

From inconsistent 2D proposals
to coherent 3D instances.

Overview of the two-stage SAM2Scene framework
A

Multi-View Proposal Association

3D projection establishes cross-view matches. Support views, projected IoU, and predicted IoU jointly rank prototypes and form stable proposal groups without sequential drift.

B

Adaptive-Fidelity Clustering

Reliability cues shape the superpoint graph, while fidelity-guided seed ranking and region growing allow high-quality clusters to expand first.

A clean break from
prior pipelines.

SAM2Scene combines the broad proposal coverage of per-view segmentation with stable cross-view identity and reliability-aware 3D clustering.

Comparison of independent lifting, tracking-based clustering, and SAM2Scene

More complete instances.
More accurate boundaries.

Across ScanNetV2, ScanNet200, and ScanNet++, SAM2Scene consistently improves over frame-by-frame lifting and tracking-based methods.

Qualitative comparison on ScanNetV2 and ScanNet++
From left to right: input, SAI3D, SAM2Object, SAM2Scene, and ground truth. Red circles mark representative errors.
Sparse-view robustness

Stable even when observations are sparse.

SAM2Scene remains consistently ahead across all view budgets. The advantage is especially clear when selected views fall from 5% to 2%, where tracking-based propagation degrades more sharply.

Sparse-view performance comparison on ScanNetV2

Cite SAM2Scene

The bibliographic record can be updated here once the official ACM DOI is available.

@inproceedings{zhao2026sam2scene,
  title     = {SAM2Scene: SAM Knows How to Segment 3D Instances},
  author    = {Zhao, Jihuai and Zhuo, Junbao and Wang, Liyong and
               Liu, Chang and Zou, Bochao and Chen, Jiansheng and Ma, Huimin},
  booktitle = {Proceedings of the 34th ACM International Conference on Multimedia},
  year      = {2026}
}